Kant and Modern Philosophy Audiobook (Free)

Kant’s program is stated, analyzed, and duly reconstructed. On this basis, cogent analyses of induction, causation, and scientific method are placed forth.

Introduction

Component 1. The Cogency of Kant’s Transcendental Quarrels

The ambiguity of the term “concept”

“Artificial” and “a priori” defined

Kant’s conception of a priority and analyticity

Kant’s conception of non-analyticity

Kant in the part of paraperceptual ideation in analytical idea

Transcendental?Analyticity-based

Kant’s crypto- about Kant and Contemporary Philosophy empiricism

Arithmetic not a priori

Transcendentalism=Psychologism

Kant’s rearguard empiricism

Why Kant’s positions are nonetheless correct

A priori knowledge a prerequisite for a posteriori knowledge

Kant on Hume in Causation

Component 2. The Analogue-Digital Differentiation and the Totally Logical Basis of Induction and Causal

Explanation

The idea of instantaneousness

Hume’s position doubly erroneous

The analogue-digital distinction

The existence of required connections of the non-instantaneousness of most spatiotemporal

existence

Temporal order to become understood with regards to causation, not vice versa

The spuriousness of Hume’s argument for spontaneous creation

Summary of sections I-VI.

Induction a surgical procedure on analogue-content

Perceptual content not digitizable

The spuriousness of Hume’s argument for the legitimacy of counterpredictive inductions

The lands of inductive inference vs. linguistic representations of such grounds

Hume’s associationism false with respect to our theories, accurate only with respect to Hume’s

ideas about our ideas

Some Consequences of our System

The non-probativeness of some of the standard arguments for skepticism

The Kantian roots of the system

These points with regards to the type of probability

Whitehead and Russell in spatiotemporal order

The crypto-conversativism of epistemic relativism

Chomsky’s epistemic conservativism

Ontogenetic a posteriori ? phylogenetic a priori

Chomsky’s rationalism in fact an extreme form of empiricism

The unconscious